return to business as from time to time happens on this blog, the administrative affairs of Marano di Napoli, a city which city councilor. Com 'is known to those who follow the local political events in recent days, things have happened: two councilors have resigned (Nasti and cloud), two directors majority abstained on a proposal from the administration (and Amitrano Carandente) , six other directors were absent from the majority to an important meeting of the Board (Infantocci, Chianese, Iorio, Prince, Baiano and Severino), and a leader of the council majority (Coppola) has left office.
This is a series of political events that individually could also represent personal choices but inserted into a sequence of a few days give the sign of a clear political crisis.
Where do these divisions and what they imply for the administration and the city?
The divisions arise, I believe, an administrative project that seems increasingly incapable of responding to people's needs and is proving increasingly politically weak.
Two months ago, myself, along with fellow Democratic Party and a few others, tried to make it clear that the administrative situation had reached a point so critical that it requires a rigorous and serious change of pace. The financial crisis on the one hand, the lack of design vision and operational capacity of the other have led the administration, in his first two and a half years in a sort of quagmire. The city seemed riveted to his emergency: traffic, traffic disruption, inefficiency, lack of design work on the local economy and cultural identity, lack of strategic planning on making community. It was necessary to change the registry. Necessary to change the method, opening participation and collegiality. And you had to change the structure, opening the executives to skilled people, motivated, capable, selected the contents and values \u200b\u200band not on numbers and shirts.
Faced with these demands, some parties are entrenched. They have defended their handling of space while denying access to valuable technical or more political motivated and competent. They were afraid of losing power stations and so short-sighted, have chosen to protect the vegetable garden today without realizing that it lost the city of tomorrow.
The mayor, meanwhile, was to challenge the silly resistance of the parties, and should have said: "The situation is critical, I do not work you have done, now change everything and do a circle. Who's there are. If not all at home. "
I'm sure that it would close out better governance: people with more serious to deal with the crisis, with more planning and a real cohesion between those (few or many) that would remain to support the project. Instead
si è avuto paura, o non si è avuta la capacità di fare la cosa giusta. Si è confermato il quadro esistente, con un sovrappiù di tensione politica, di insoddisfazione, di frustrazione.
Il risultato è quello che si vede oggi. Gli assessori si dimettono, le forze politiche si spaccano, i dissidi interni consumano le energie e quel poco che si potrebbe fare viene eroso dalla conflittualità.
A questo punto, però, ci si chiede: che fare? C’è chi dice che non c’è più spazio per rimediare e che bisogna sciogliere il Consiglio e andare ad elezioni ad aprile prossimo. Lo dice l’opposizione, ovviamente, ansiosa di diventare maggioranza. E lo dice anche qualche pezzo di maggioranza, che forse immagina di poter rivincere le elezioni.
Io ho un’altra opinione. Penso che l’amministrazione debba proseguire il suo mandato.
Sono stato, in questi anni, tra quelli che hanno fatto più critiche al sindaco e alla sua gestione. Eppure penso che oggi in città non esista un’alternativa a questo quadro politico. Da eventuali elezioni ad aprile, la città può ricavare un’amministrazione peggiore. O, nella migliore delle ipotesi, “pareggiare”: cioè avere un quadro simile, per limiti e provenienze. Perché ho questa certezza? Perché osservo la vita politica e sociale in città. Non vedo soggettività in movimento. Non vedo persone nuove. Non vedo tensione sociale. Vedo crisis and detachment. In this context, who would win? The usual suspects. In difficult times, the most persuasive arguments are stinking.
So what to do? Continue this way? No, I do not believe that either. I think we should take the path that was made two months ago an abortion. The mayor must relocate at the top of the situation and make a speech clear to the parties. Must recognize that the situation is dramatic and clear to all that it takes a joint effort of responsibility and seriousness. We must get around a table and secure a five point program for the next two years: 1) the collection and diffenziata new cycle of waste, 2) economic rehabilitation of the institution, and 3) launch a plan for maintenance the city in its road network, infrastructure, services and urban, 4) redefinition of the internal road network, increased vigilance and monitoring progress on the carpet stop wild; 5) launched a project on culture and identity development, aggregating the local community, drawing some prospect of recovery and development planning.
parties that are required to sign this paper and commit to provide support, ideas and resources appropriate to the administration. On this basis we need to build organizational charts of the highest profile, they are able to ensure the achievement of these goals.
only way to end the crisis and strengthen a relationship with a city frustrated, tired, exhausted. Any suggestion otherwise would be suicide. The early elections would be a suicide in advance. The field would have to pull a postdated suicide.
In PD, as secretary and as a city councilor, along with my companions, I will try to work on this track. We hope to get something.
0 comments:
Post a Comment