hundred thousand people signed an online Appeal for Saviano. Also sign several Nobel laureates. Students aim to turn a purple ribbon to indicate their proximity to the writer threatened by the mafia. Does anyone dare to ask him for the Nobel Prize for Peace. I think it is 're really exaggerating.
Anyone who knows me knows that I have an ancient and solid estimate for Roberto Saviano. He has close and long before his attentive admirer of success, when he was, like many of us, harassed and anxious, in the local press to propose pieces, case studies, stories. I have total admiration for Gomorrah, a book written well, I was never passionate disputes about fiction and reality, on the narrative, autobiography and journalism (a non-issue for literature). I've never beaten the scopiazzature (myself I recognized pieces of work) because I think that the news of all is that writing is unique and unrepeatable.
But I really think you're exaggerating. I always more the feeling - nasty - that Bob has become a reservoir from which to extract as much profit as possible, even if it means killing him to extreme erosion.
are trademarks around him who are killing and whether Casale were to commit what they promise, they, in my opinion, would be only the perpetrators. The moral principals would be found in the car fierce publishing business. So to say one of those things that nobody wants to hear. Politically incorrect. But it seems clear that Saviano is exposed beyond measure with the goal to get us the most from a commercial standpoint. No coincidence that the initiatives that inflate the balloon of the tam tam media always come from the same publishing group. Che lo mette in copertina. Che lancia appelli. Che lo manda a sfidare la camorra, sotto le telecamere. Che costruisce l’evento, lo vende, registra la reazione, e poi rilancia. Un meccanismo che mi fa orrore soprattutto perché si gioca sulla pelle di un uomo, che viene venduto ormai un tanto al respiro.
Ad ogni minaccia, la Mondadori fa una ristampa.
Chi conosce il libro sa che Gomorra non è la storia dei casalesi ma una narrazione sulla camorra, nel suo insieme. E che – oltre la straordinaria suggestione che lo anima e ne fa un capolavoro letterario – il libro documenta cose note, la cui rivelazione non crea alcun danno aggiunto alla criminalità. Chi conosce Gomorra sa che i casalesi occupano nel libro solo uno degli spazi. Then he speaks of the Di Lauro, the divisions, the Chinese, the Neapolitans, and many other faces. The threat of death, however, comes only from Casale. Why? Why are the fiercest? Maybe. But we must recall that Saviano was put to Commons until after the publication of the book, and even after the boom in publishing, but after his first appearance in Casal di Principe when he attended a political rally and called forcefully for the guys Casale to get rid of the "scum Camorra." An act of great courage. But that has little to do with literature. An act of civil power, which obviously was iperpompato the newspapers. The result was a challenge. And it was a challenge to jump on the chair Casale. Quell'impertinenza. The insult to the streets. From there it all came about. And from there he played a game to raise. The first threat. A new challenge media: an interview, an article. Another threat. Media remains a challenge: the presence at the trial, a reading public.
now the book has nothing to do nothing. It 's a lot of principle. And between the Camorra and a writer. But among the camorra and Saviano.
was the case from going so far? I think not. And I think it is a clear desire for commercial success. Not by Saviano. For those who know him know that it is culturally alien to any cult of self and success. But della infernale macchina editoriale che ha deciso di mungergli fino all’ultima goccia di latte. E allora Saviano va in tv a rincarare la dose, Saviano va in copertina sull’Espresso, Saviano finisce al centro di rivelazioni di pentiti che poi si rimangiano tutto, Saviano a Matrix, Saviano di nuovo in piazza a rilanciare la sfida. La tensione sale, le vendite si impennano. Saviano a Cannes. Saviano a Hollywood. Intanto la Mondadori ristampa, il gruppo Espresso-Repubblica, parallelamente, con una mano rilancia gli appelli e con l’altra pubblica, in esclusiva, il ringraziamento all’appello.
Franco Roberti, coordinatore della direzione distrettuale antimafia di Napoli, persona al di sopra di ogni sospetto per quanto riguarda la lotta crime, told with clarity and courage: "You do not need heroes or martyrs, but a serious political mafia that beyond the spectacle, as the exhibition of Saviano, give concrete answers to citizens in terms of law, economic development, security . Paradoxically
Saviano could become a fig leaf, one which covers the shame of an inactive state, which he copes with the solidarity of a political party and locked, that gets along with honorary citizenships, a society that is indifferent good and appeals only to sign, of an economic system and business community that gets along by giving a prize at Cannes, one in Hollywood, maybe the Nobel Prize and gaining profit, benefits, money (and that we care if we kill him, so he had to tell us we gave him).
Franco Roberti concluded thus: "we witness a spectacular unnecessary and harmful. Saviano is protected by the state. But we can not defy the danger hanging over him, literally grow unnecessarily. "
I make my own the words of Roberts and I say to Saviano, enough. You wrote an extraordinary book. You have contributed to knowledge. You did what a writer should do. You also did make money. That's enough. Stand back from the business, which is to get this really in danger.
The moral principals of those killers that I hope will consume impotence, have already set up for cover when he jumps in air, have a printed edition and one million copies in stores. I am ready to publish post-mortem collection of your articles to six euro and ninety in the Annex on Wednesday.
seems to me that you have already explained enough.
leave Saviano alone, to save it. This is the only appeal now to subscribe.
0 comments:
Post a Comment